Sorry, we don't support your browser.  Install a modern browser

Optional private controllFeature suggestion: strategy alert message body support + optional private controllerer for strategy alert normalization#737

P

Hello,
I’d like to submit a feature suggestion regarding webhook flexibility for advanced TradingView strategies.

Context:
Cornix works reliably with TradingView alerts that use predefined, static alert message templates.
However, TradingView strategy-based alerts can generate a dynamic alert message body at runtime, containing strategy-specific execution information (such as direction, identifiers, or state).

At the moment, this dynamically generated alert content cannot be reliably consumed unless it is replaced by a fixed, predefined payload.

Suggested enhancements (two related areas):

Strategy-generated alert message body support
Allow Cornix to accept and parse alert messages where the alert body is generated dynamically by the TradingView strategy, rather than requiring a fully static template.
This would enable more advanced strategies to pass execution intent without hardcoding payloads.

Optional private controller/server layer
Introduce an opt-in architecture where users may route TradingView alerts through a user-controlled private controller/server before forwarding them to Cornix.

Proposed flow:

TradingView → User’s Private Controller → Cornix

The private controller would:

Receive the strategy-generated alert message body

Validate, normalize, and apply safety checks

Forward a Cornix-compatible payload using the existing UUID + secret mechanism

Security considerations:

Fully opt-in, no impact on existing users

API keys, signatures, or IP allowlists could be enforced

Cornix remains the final execution authority

Sensitive strategy logic remains private to the user

Benefits:

Enables advanced strategy automation without static templates

Improves robustness (validation, deduplication, formatting)

Keeps execution logic private and secure

Broadens Cornix’s appeal to professional and algorithmic users

I believe these enhancements would significantly increase flexibility while preserving Cornix’s security and reliability standards.

Thank you for considering this suggestion.

Best regards,

5 months ago
1

Yes I also need this feature

4 months ago